Doc 20 gets a status table instead of a narrative: D-1/D0/D1 done, D2 reverted, D3's goal met but its MEANS skipped (waits still park in place — only the stack they park on changed), D4/D5/D6 not started. Plus an explicit "what was skipped and is still owed" list, so nothing quietly reads as delivered: dispatch contexts, waits-as-yields, bridges, real-park-site buffer sizing, the both-EH CI matrix. Doc 22 is the handoff plan a fresh session can implement from: - the bug it targets is the BLUE SCREEN (a context recovered twice or by the wrong fiber), not doc 19's hang, which is fixed and was only one ingredient; - the diagnosis that matters: bookkeeping is already centralised (currData is single-writer, the shim sees every swap) but the DECISION is not — libcontext decides swaps and never tells anyone, so three layers each invented heuristics. Centralising means moving the decision; - why D2/D3 knotted, with the measurements, so nobody retries that order; - phases A-F with estimates (~4-6 wk): A absorbs libcontext behaviour- preservingly and is landable ALONE (the de-risking step D2 never had), B+C+D must land as one commit, E bridges, F deletes the guards only once they are provably silent; - gates including the crash's own repro, since the batteries never reproduced it and therefore cannot certify it; - the traps this run paid for: 16-byte fiber stack alignment, the per-fiber stack-limits gotcha, host-side asyncify buffers, the stack-ownership rule, partial migration, and the gitignored-artifact triage trick; - measured build/test cycle costs, so the estimates are grounded. README: index rows for 21 and 22, doc 19 marked FIXED, and the stale 2026-06 "single decisive next step" folded away behind the current one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TEHGiiXMShNXbBr7gSJ7iz
13 KiB
22 — Absorbing libcontext: one scheduler for JS ↔ Asyncify ↔ fibers
Status: PLAN (2026-08-06), not started. Continues
20after its D-1/D0/D1 landed, its D2 was reverted, and its D3 met its goal by other means. Read20§10 (work log) and21(park-site table) first; this doc assumes both.Decisions already taken by the user: absorb (the scheduler takes over libcontext's wasm backend — one fiber system, not two cooperating ones), and the work continues on
feature/async-mailbox.
1. The bug this exists to kill
The blue screen: RuntimeError: index out of bounds (and its siblings unreachable executed, indirect call to null) raised from Asyncify.doRewind, killing the tab during
board loads. Its shape, in the field logs' own words: a context gets recovered twice, or
recovered by a different fiber than the one that parked it, or recovered from a buffer
another party has since overwritten (aliased-wake-live: restoring currData=X over Y).
This is not doc 19's hang. Doc 19 is fixed (a quasi-modal's nested loop no longer parks on a coroutine stack), and that fix removed one ingredient — concurrent parks on fiber stacks — without touching the cause. Anyone reading doc 20 alone may conclude the migration is optional; measured against the blue screen it is not.
2. Why the guards cannot fix it (the real diagnosis)
Asyncify.currData is a single global slot naming "the context currently unwinding or
rewinding". Today three layers each decide swaps and resumes with partial information:
| layer | decides | guards it invented |
|---|---|---|
libcontext (kicad/thirdparty/libcontext/libcontext.cpp) |
every fiber↔fiber swap | swap_suspended, jump-refused-parked, jump-refused-hot-main, ghost-resume epochs |
the JS shim (scripts/common/shims/asyncify-scheduler.js) |
wake delivery, resume admission | __internallyParked, __parkSleepBuf, __validSuspensions, fiber-resume-refused, aliased-wake-live |
wx (wxwidgets/src/wasm/evtloop.cpp) |
whether dispatch may run | wxWasmDispatchDepth interlock, zero/restore around parks |
The bookkeeping is already centralised — the decision is not. S2 made currData a
single-writer accessor with a stray tripwire, and the shim already wraps
Fibers.finishContextSwitch and authorises the write. So the shim sees every swap; what
it cannot do is prevent one, because the decision to swap was made in libcontext, which
never told it. Each layer is therefore reduced to answering "is entering this fiber safe?"
by inference, and each invented its own heuristic. That thicket is the patchwork.
Centralising means moving the decision, not adding more observation.
3. Why the phases knotted (do not repeat this)
Doc 20 sequenced D2 (dispatch on a context) → D3 (waits yield contexts). Both orders fail:
- D2 alone (measured, reverted): a quasi-modal opened from a tick handler suspends the
dispatch context inside a still-in-place wait, adding an Asyncify layer beneath every
libcontext fiber. The coroutine-nested battery died at
fiber_create_run_destroy_inside_modal(aliased-wake-live→fiber-resume-refused). Growing a context pool made it worse (8 contexts burned in 30 ms — a context suspended in a modal is consumed for that modal's lifetime); falling back to entry-stack dispatch did not help either, because the extra layer exists the moment the context is suspended. - D3 alone (measured, guarded): a wait must yield the context that owns its stack,
and the doc-19 path's owner is a tool coroutine, not a scheduler context.
yield_parknow refuses that case (foreignStackRefusals) rather than saving the tool fiber's stack into the host context's fiber struct.
So the dependency is a knot: dispatch needs waits migrated, waits need tool coroutines to be contexts, tool coroutines are libcontext's. Absorbing libcontext is what unties it, which is why it comes first here rather than last.
4. Target architecture
browser tick ─► scheduler.drain() ONE decision point
│ registry = truth; at most one transition in flight
├─► dispatch context (wx handlers)
├─► tool contexts (KiCad COROUTINEs — libcontext's clients)
├─► wait contexts (modal / nested / popup)
└─► bridge contexts (lib, 3D, occ, ngspice, clipboard, font)
Invariants, all already implemented and tested in wx/wasm/private/sched_context.h:
- Star, not mesh — contexts yield only to the scheduler; only the scheduler resumes. A resume is a registry lookup, never an inference.
- One transition in flight;
drain()is not re-entrant. - Wakes never resume inline —
mark_readyqueues,drainresumes from a clean stack. - A context yields only its own stack — enforced by stack-range ownership check.
- Buffers are owned: one context, one stack, one asyncify buffer, never shared.
5. Phases
Estimates assume one engineer familiar with this stack, and are grounded in this run's measured cycle costs (§8). The A / BCD / E / F split matters: A is landable alone because it is behaviour-preserving; B+C+D must land together (§3).
Phase A — absorb libcontext's wasm backend (3–5 d) · landable alone
Replace the body of libcontext's wasm implementation so make_fcontext / jump_fcontext /
release_fcontext become thin adapters over pcbjam_sched, keeping the exact same
observable semantics (symmetric swap, same return values, same INVOCATION_ARGS contract).
The registry now knows every tool fiber: its stack range, its buffer, its status.
- Keep libcontext's existing guards as tripwires that must never fire; do not delete.
- No caller changes. KiCad still calls
jump_fcontext; TOOL_MANAGER is untouched. - Gate: coroutine trio + coroutine-nested + races + full kicad suite unchanged, and zero tripwire firings across the fuzz suites.
- Why it is safe alone: semantics are identical; only the party doing the bookkeeping changes. This is the de-risking step D2 never had.
Phase B — tool coroutines become scheduler contexts (1–2 wk) · the bulk
Flip the topology from symmetric to star: COROUTINE::Resume/Call become
mark-ready-and-drain; a coroutine yields to the scheduler rather than to its resumer.
- The seam is
CALL_CONTEXT/doCall/doResumeinkicad/include/tool/coroutine.hplusTOOL_MANAGER'sm_activeStatehandling. RunMainStackmust keep working — it is now "run on the scheduler's caller context".- Expect this to be most of the risk and most of the calendar time.
Phase C — waits yield the owning context (3–5 d)
wxWasmYieldUntil becomes a context yield: look up the owner of the current stack (the
mechanism exists), park it, and let resolveWait mark it ready. The doc-19 main-stack
bounce (wx/wasm/private/mainstack.h) becomes unnecessary and should be removed in the
same flip — it is a mitigation for exactly the condition this phase eliminates.
Phase D — dispatch on a context (3–5 d)
Doc 20's D2, retried. The reverted implementation is recoverable from git
(design-b D2 in the work log) and was correct apart from its dependencies; the pool idea
in it is wrong and must not come back — one dispatch context suffices once waits yield.
B + C + D land as ONE commit. Each alone regresses. Build them on a sub-branch, keep every guard as a tripwire, flip once, gate hard.
Phase E — bridges on contexts (1 wk)
Doc 21 §1's K1–K7 and W4/W5 through one wasm_await_promise-style helper. After this no
handleSleep park happens on any fiber stack — assert it. Take each bridge's deep-park
high-water from its own beacon and size buffers from that (doc 21 §2b); D1's ~34 B/frame is
a synthetic floor, not a budget.
Phase F — delete the guard thicket (2–3 d)
Only now, and only guards that have been provably silent: libcontext's refusals, the shim's
quarantine/consume-once, the wx interlock and its zero/restore sites, the open/fiber-busy
gates. Flip fiber-resume-park.spec.ts from "refused" to "resumed after its park resolves".
Total: ~4–6 weeks, of which B is half.
6. Gates — what "done" means
The batteries never reproduced the blue screen, so they cannot certify it. Use all three:
- The crash's own repro (the only proof that matters):
REPRO_PROFILE+ a ≥120 MB project + 2–4 warm loads; watch for the68/Ncounters andkill-fibersignature. Target:rootHotTotal == 0, zeroaliased-wake-live, zero refusals. - The full net: kicad suite, wx battery, coroutine trio, races,
sched-context,quasimodal-strand(now a green regression pin), the drift/collab fuzz suites. - Tripwire silence: every guard retained during A–E must record zero firings across a full fuzz run before Phase F deletes it.
Known-pre-existing failures to expect and NOT chase: occ-probe glb format matrix, and
e2e/modal.spec.ts:125 (environment-sensitive; fails on unchanged binaries).
7. Invariants and traps learned in this run
Hard-won; each cost at least one build+test cycle.
- Fiber C stacks must be 16-byte aligned.
EM_ASMputs its argument buffer on the running stack and the glue assertsbuf % 16 == 0; emscripten's malloc gives 8. A misaligned context traps inreadEmAsmArgson everyEM_ASM(found via 107 wx failures).AlignedBufferinsched_context.hhandles it — do not hand a fiber astd::vector<char>::data(). emscripten_stack_get_base()/end()describe the CURRENT stack, not the main one.finishContextSwitchcallsemscripten_stack_set_limitswith the incoming fiber's bounds, so a live query reports "on the main stack" from everywhere and detects nothing — silently. Capture the main stack's bounds once, where you are provably on it.- Every
emscripten_fiber_tneeds its own asyncify buffer, including the host side of a swap. A zero-initialised one has a null buffer and traps on first swap. This briefly looked like proof that fiber-on-context nesting was impossible; it is not —fiber_nests_in_contextpins that it works. - A wait must yield the context that owns its stack. Yielding a context you merely sit on top of saves the wrong stack into its fiber struct: silent, total, undetectable after the fact.
- Partial migration is worse than none — measured twice (§3). If a change leaves one participant parking in place while another expects contexts, it will regress.
- A parked context must not be freed, and a resume must never be inferred. Both are registry lookups; keep them that way.
- Test-infrastructure trap:
tests/apps/gal-webgl+build-wasm/sysroothold gitignored artifacts no normal build produces. Losing them looks like a 29-test mass regression. Fix:scripts/setup-worktree.sh. When triaging a mass failure, first runfind tests/apps -name '*.wasm' -newermt <last known good>— it settles "my change vs the environment" in seconds.
8. Cycle costs (for planning)
Measured on the dev Mac, warm caches: wx rebuild ~5 min · all wx test apps ~10 min ·
docker/build.sh kicad_editor ~15 min · wx+asyncify+coroutine battery ~5 min · full kicad
suite ~8 min. So one full "change → verdict" loop on a KiCad-side change is ~25–30 min, and
a wx-only change ~20 min. Budget phases accordingly; batch experiments per build.
9. Where the pieces are
| what | where |
|---|---|
| context primitives + registry + memory gate | wxwidgets/include/wx/wasm/private/sched_context.h (header-only) |
| its harness + gate | tests/apps/standalone/sched-context/, tests/asyncify/sched-context.spec.ts |
| the scheduler shim (mailbox, waits, wakes, guards) | scripts/common/shims/asyncify-scheduler.js |
| libcontext's wasm backend (Phase A's target) | kicad/thirdparty/libcontext/libcontext.cpp |
| tool coroutine seam (Phase B) | kicad/include/tool/coroutine.h, kicad/common/tool/tool_manager.cpp |
| wait bridges (Phase C) | wxwidgets/src/wasm/evtloop.cpp, dialog.cpp, window.cpp |
| the doc-19 mitigation to remove at Phase C | wxwidgets/include/wx/wasm/private/mainstack.h, wasm/bindings/main_stack_runner.h, TOOL_MANAGER::RunOnMainStackIfActiveTool |
| park-site inventory | 21 §1 |
| doc-19 regression pin | tests/kicad/quasimodal-strand.spec.ts |
Branch: feature/async-mailbox, unpushed across 6 repos. Baseline tags:
mailbox-s0-baseline, d-1-pre-delete. Tag before each phase's flip.
10. Open questions
- pthreads. Doc 21 §2 settled that every Asyncify park is main-thread and the lib bridge's worker path is a blocking proxy. Phase A must re-check that libcontext is never driven from a worker before assuming the scheduler is main-thread-only.
- Buffer sizing. Still unmeasured for real park sites (§5 Phase E). libcontext's 512 K is inherited, D1's 128 K is a guess with a synthetic floor behind it.
- D5 (main loop as a context) stays optional. The 68/1 class is currently held closed by v0.1.28's scheduling trick; decide with Phase E's telemetry in hand, not before.
- Does Phase B change upstream-divergence policy? It touches
coroutine.handtool_manager.cppstructurally. Worth deciding up front whether that divergence is acceptable or whether the adapter should stay entirely inside libcontext.