docs(ysync-review): repro suite results + empirical findings (doc 16); plan 15 executed

New doc 16: the full repro-suite map (per-bug unit/e2e paths with verified
failure sites), the phase-C probe outcome, and four findings only the RUNNING
system revealed:
- F1: bug 03's sending half emits NOTHING — a child-only delete commit never
  triggers a flush at all (worse than the doc's predicted bare removed-wire);
  the GetWidth-assert tracer evidence and the fix implication.
- F2: Firefox cannot host two kicad_editor tabs in one context (per-process
  wasm budget) — bug-01 two-tab repros are Chromium-only.
- F3: headless emit WORKS on both pcbnew and eeschema — the legacy two-tab
  skip rationale and items-bridge localEdit omissions are stale.
- F4: drift-detect is strictly ITEM-silent on the green path (no writer-
  formatting false positives).

Cross-updates: 00 index + verdict note; 01/04/05/06/07 Verification sections
gain their repro paths; 02 upgraded to runtime-CONFIRMED; 03 gains the F1
empirical correction; 11 (no v2 e2e coverage) CLOSED with a point-by-point
status update — only the legacy retirement remains.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DPfrVhfYgPPgtawjSssZfn
This commit is contained in:
Viktor Vaczi 2026-07-03 12:43:55 +02:00 • committed by Gergő Törcsvári
commit 80135a99ac
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 8E75F2CDE64E5322
17 changed files with 1431 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
# Bug 03 — Child-only deletions leave a dangling `{item}` slot in the parent's Y body
**Severity:** high (poisons a room's render/materialize path; three-way divergence)
**Status:** open
## Where
- `web/pcbjam-shared/src/kicad-y.ts:152-181` — `applyDeltaToY` cleans up **root layout**
slots for removed items but never prunes `{item: uuid}` slots from a surviving
**parent's body**
- `wasm/bindings/pcbnew_embind.cpp:656-660` — `flushDiff`'s removed loop pushes raw
uuids with no `liftBlob` counterpart (adds/changes lift a touched child to a parent
re-blob; removals don't)
- `wasm/bindings/pcbnew_embind.cpp:831-844` — `doApplyItems` removed loop *skips*
items with `GetParentFootprint()` ("covered by its parent's replace/remove")
- `web/pcbjam-shared/src/kicad-doc.ts:205-207` — `renderItemInner` throws
`renderItem: missing item <uuid>` on a dangling reference
## Trigger
Delete a footprint **user field** (Footprint Properties → remove a field row) or a
footprint's user text child on the pcbnew board editor:
1. The child uuid vanishes from `forEachTopItem`'s snapshot → it lands in `removed`.
2. The footprint's own scalar json (`itemToJson`: id/type/x/y/layer) is **unchanged**,
so no parent blob is emitted alongside — the wire is exactly
`{ removed: [childUuid] }`.
## Consequences
Three states diverge simultaneously:
- **Y.Doc:** `applyDeltaToY` deletes the child item, but the parent footprint's body
still contains the `{item: childUuid}` slot. From now on:
- `renderItem(parent)` throws → `deltaToItemsWire` throws inside the `observeDeep`
callback on **any** later remote change touching that footprint, aborting the whole
batch's conversion (other items in the same transaction are dropped too).
- `docToFile` throws → ydoc-mode materialization fails (WasmTool catches it and falls
back to the API fetch, so opens survive, but the room can't be rendered).
- **Receiving editor:** the C++ removed loop skips the child (parent-footprint guard)
→ the peer *keeps* the field.
- **Sending editor:** the field is gone.
Partial mitigation that exists by accident: if the footprint is later modified, its
blob re-upserts the whole body (`upsertYItem` replaces `body` wholesale) and the
dangling slot disappears — the poison self-heals *only if* that footprint changes
again.
eeschema is not currently exposed to this specific trigger because symbol fields are
not visited by its snapshot at all (they're invisible to the differ — see
[04-bug-lossy-change-detection.md](04-bug-lossy-change-detection.md)), so a field
deletion there simply doesn't emit.
## Fix direction
Two layers, both worth doing:
1. **Emit side (root cause):** make removals lift like adds/changes do. In `flushDiff`,
when a removed uuid's baseline entry belonged to a footprint child whose parent
still exists, emit the parent's re-blob in `wChanged` instead of a bare child
removal (mirror `liftBlob`'s dedup via `wDone`). The parent's new body then carries
the correct child set end to end, and the C++ receiver's parent-replace covers the
deletion naturally.
2. **Shared-lib side (defense in depth):** in `applyDeltaToY`, when deleting an item
whose `parent` still exists in the items map, prune the `{item: uuid}` slot from the
parent's body (a body rewrite via `upsertYItem`-style set). This keeps the
"file recoverable from the Y.Doc alone" invariant unconditionally true, whatever a
future emitter sends.
## Verification
Unit test in `kicad-y`/`items-wire`: apply `{removed:[child]}` where the parent
survives; assert `renderItem(parent)` and `docToFile` still succeed and the parent body
no longer references the child. Integration: delete a footprint user field on tab A,
assert tab B loses the field and the room still materializes.
Repro tests (2026-07-03): units in `web/pcbjam-shared/test/ysync-repros.test.ts`
(`renderItem: missing item` + `docToFile` through the dangling slot); e2e Y-half in
`tests/kicad/ysync-two-tab.spec.ts`, receiving + sending halves in
`tests/kicad/ysync-repros-pcbnew.spec.ts`.
**Empirical correction (finding F1 in
[16](16-repro-suite-results-and-empirical-findings.md)):** the sending half is WORSE
than the Trigger section above predicts — headless, a child-only delete commit never
triggers a flush at all (not even the bare `{removed:[child]}` wire goes out; the
snapshot-tracer shows `flushDiff` never ran). The emit-side fix therefore starts one
layer earlier: make the listener see the child-removal commit, THEN lift it to the
parent re-blob.